Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 20:11:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, imp@village.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Racing interrupts Message-ID: <199911012011.NAA00533@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <381B87A0.559C2CE7@softweyr.com> from "Wes Peters" at Oct 30, 99 06:04:48 pm
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Specifically, if the card has been correctly shut down before > > (or as a part of) the detach process, why would it generate > > an interrupt? > > The card eject notification. I understand that there be an interrupt for the eject. My question is "why an unfielded interrupt?"; sorry if that was not clear. I don't understand why the card services would not field that particular interrupt, unless the code was written incorrectly. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911012011.NAA00533>