Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:12:53 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why should I upgrade from 2.2.8 to 3.4 Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000216131102.04308c80@localhost> In-Reply-To: <38AAE878.C26E278F@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002152357380.54931-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <200002160926.CAA09916@harmony.village.org> <00021604155000.08535@nomad.dataplex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:12 AM 2/16/2000 , Wes Peters wrote: >And this coming from the 2.x "keeper of the flame." Yes, 2.2.8 should carry >a warning label of some sort. On the other hand, some things in 2.2.8 were actually more secure than later versions. When the ADMROCKS exploit got out, I discovered that the BIND that shipped with 2.2.8 wasn't susceptible. Systems with newer versions of BIND were. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000216131102.04308c80>