Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:02:16 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: paul@originative.co.uk Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAX_UID ? Message-ID: <200003130202.SAA51491@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <38CC4AFD.7E649664@originative.co.uk> References: <38CAD957.3C839375@originative.co.uk> <38CB322D.D12ED0B0@originative.co.uk> <200003130145.RAA51429@vashon.polstra.com> <38CC4AFD.7E649664@originative.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <38CC4AFD.7E649664@originative.co.uk>, Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> wrote: > John Polstra wrote: > > > > I guess it could go into <machine/limits.h> in the > > "!defined(_ANSI_SOURCE)" section. Bruce might have a better idea. > > I don't think <machine/limits.h> is the right place. These are constants > that are definately not architecture dependent. The whole problem at the > moment is that the code is abusing architecture dependent constants in > lieu of anything better. Hmm, you're right. How about <sys/syslimits.h>? John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003130202.SAA51491>