Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 14:29:25 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Subject: Re: .s -> .S filename change in /sys Message-ID: <20000511142925.A7875@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <391B1D1C.A299A05C@softweyr.com>; from wes@softweyr.com on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 02:50:36PM -0600 References: <200005102341.TAA07315@server.baldwin.cx> <391A525F.E4B9D3DA@softweyr.com> <20000511103104.A5531@dragon.nuxi.com> <391B1D1C.A299A05C@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 02:50:36PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > > So that the next time somebody sticks a #include or #if in them, we > can go through this argument again? Yeah, that's a GREAT idea. Some things we never want to go thru the C pre-processor, etc. .s's that don't use the pre-processor today, and that we don't mind using it in the future are certainly candidates for renameing. But forcing *all* .s files that direction is wrong. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000511142925.A7875>