Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 19:28:30 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: socket programming Message-ID: <20000514192830.A12892@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <391cd7e80.3e9@databus.databus.com>; from barney@databus.com on Fri, May 12, 2000 at 11:56:00PM -0400 References: <391cd7e80.3e9@databus.databus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Barney Wolff (barney@databus.com):
> Well, telnet is a funny protocol. Both answers have been wrong.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Interesting point. Unfortunately, since the server isn't going to echo
back the chars, DON'T ECHO has the same effect.
The difference between DON'T/WILL has effect if you assume, that the
server echo's back each char it receives. Then client in WILL
situation will echo, client in DON'T won't echo. But since the server
won't echo anyways, there's no difference.
You could have pointed that out without telling us we are wrong, which
isn't true.
Alex
--
I need a new ~/.sig.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000514192830.A12892>