Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 04:37:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010825043725.A55393@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3B874AB9.2090702@yahoo.com>; from kc5vdj@yahoo.com on Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:50:33AM -0500 References: <20010825053016.D17363810@overcee.netplex.com.au> <3B874AB9.2090702@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:50:33AM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > For 5.0, I maybe the black sheep in saying this, but I'd like to see > /bin/csh be the real thing for 5.0. By all means, leave tcsh in > /bin, but for the sake of backwards compatability, IMHO `ln > /bin/tcsh /bin/csh` was a bad idea. Frankly, this isn't going to happen. We went through all this months ago: please just accept the will of the community and drop the matter. Kris --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7h430Wry0BWjoQKURAlyUAKDcvIO0AAhYohraXPn3paRKZb3YqQCffu5u /ARwH79ttqD2HhH/rtmQrjg= =vE7p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010825043725.A55393>