Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:28:13 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Valdov <dv@dv.ru> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATA driver feature request Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.1020120222410.24597B-100000@xkis.kis.ru> In-Reply-To: <3C4B17E4.1080702@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Bill Moran wrote: > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:17:56 -0500 > From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> > To: Dmitry Valdov <dv@dv.ru> > Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: ATA driver feature request > > Dmitry Valdov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to do not disable UDMA-100 when there is UDMA-33 device at > > the some IDE cable? > > w2k works fine with this hardware configuration with ATA-100. > > Are you sure it's actually running the drive at ata-100? It was an Intel driver diagnostic for Intel chipset. It says that one of drives running at ATA-100 and other at ATA-33. How I can test it another way? > > > FreeBSD limits both > > drives on the bus because there is 'non-ATA66 compliant cable'. > ^^^^^ > > Are you sure you have an 80 conductor cable and that it isn't too long? > Yes. When I disconnect secondary (non ATA-66/100 compliant) drive from this cable, FreeBSD use ATA-100 on primary. Dmitry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.1020120222410.24597B-100000>