Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 08:25:58 -0400 (EDT) From: pgreen <polytarp@m-net.arbornet.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205270823550.25183-100000@m-net.arbornet.org> In-Reply-To: <3CF1CDD7.A210BF97@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > pgreen wrote: > > Well, you have to think counter-unpartisanly. For example, using > > Ruminov's Ruminition, you can think of any idea, regardless of > > linguistical barriers. For example, let's say an Episcipitalian wishes to > > know how to know. By using Ruminov's Ruminition, he is able to: A) Think, > > purely using emotions, a language inate in any human, of the > > children. B) This, of course, leads to only one conclusion: 1) Anything > > can be known, in the context of one's reality. > > > > Thus, we see how anything can be thunk, regardeless of any so-called > > language. > > So your hypothesis is that emotions constitute a Turing-complete > language? > > -- Terry > Where did I say that? That would obviously be imposible. You're just putting words into my mouth. I suggest you reread my comment, before making such batently untrue statements. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0205270823550.25183-100000>