Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 15:20:46 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: DougB@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Idea: New file called CONTRIB Message-ID: <20020615.152046.76963466.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <3D0BA570.D7F58CAD@mindspring.com> References: <3D0B96CD.CA45F33F@FreeBSD.org> <20020615.142321.38689858.imp@village.org> <3D0BA570.D7F58CAD@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <3D0BA570.D7F58CAD@mindspring.com>
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" wrote:
: > This is different than a Maintainer. This is a bigger sign that says
: > "well, in an ideal world, this would be in contrib, but for whatever
: > reason it isn't.
:
: "And I'm too lazy to move it there."
BS Terry. I resent that remark.
: > Treat it like contrib however. Thanks."
:
: This is a lot like saying "here is the right answer, just in case
: you are interested in right answers".
:
: To me, it looks like a method of condoning people arguing in the
: source repository about whether or not something belongs in contrib.
Do you have something useful to contribute, or just carping? The
reason for it is to make sure that we properly document what is
grandfathered so people know.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020615.152046.76963466.imp>