Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:48:08 -0400 From: Jerry A! <jerry@thehutt.org> To: rob <rob@pythonemproject.com> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA tags bug fix committed to -releng4/ Now SCSI emulation Message-ID: <20020626144808.GA7380@nomad.thehutt.org> In-Reply-To: <3D19CE2C.64E4BD28@pythonemproject.com> References: <200206261012.g5QACW091684@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> <3D19CE2C.64E4BD28@pythonemproject.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:22:36AM -0700, rob wrote: : Dave Hayes wrote: : > : > My question would be: why don't we have an interface to the more : > robust SCSI emulation layer of these devices? I recognize there is : > loss of speed to be endured, but the upside is that we could use : > a lot more drives on FreeBSD. : > </relatedtangent> : > ------ : partition, and enjoyed the ability to use its built in scsi emulation. : There was no loss of speed that I could discern. I believe all CDROM : devices are inherently SCSI, its just the I/O and pinout that changes. : Please correct me if am wrong. Burncd has worked for me, but it rules : out most of the gui based burner programs. Rob. Take a look at ATAPICAM <http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/>. These patches accomplish what you're looking for. I've cc'd Soren in the hopes that he may be able to shed some light on if/when this functionality may be merged into the existing ATA framework. --Jerry Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... ...It's much more important than that! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020626144808.GA7380>