Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: offtopic: low level format of IDE drive.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207081516390.29644-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D2A0C13.BF96579@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:

> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Julian got struck by lightning; perhaps he will now stick to disks
> > > with built-in lightning rods (e.g. not succeptible to this failure),
> > > e.g. SCSI.
> > 
> > This is an urban ledgend..
> 
> That SCSI disks don't use random inter-record gap placement like
> IDE does, particularly on the "multimedia" drives that ignore the
> need for thermal recalibration, so as to not make video capture
> "jittery"?
> 
> Or that SCSI II directly supports low level track formatting,
> without requiring a "magic tool"?
> 
> 8-) 8-).

According to the specs I had access to at Whistle they were pretty much
the same low level device with different interface logic.
The ATA drives I have seen had a format capacity
just like their scsi cousins, just hard to find.


> 
> -- Terry
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207081516390.29644-100000>