Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:25:25 +0000 From: Alex Newman <dolemite@wulimasters.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netgraph could be a router also. Message-ID: <20021108002525.GC86846@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net> In-Reply-To: <3DCB0240.C61DD2E7@mindspring.com> References: <20021108000159.GE86595@host4.rpi.wulimasters.net> <3DCB0240.C61DD2E7@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Could we implement {bgp & ospf} in netgraph?
> > What would need to be done assuming the Netgraph TCP/IP happen?
> > Is this a bad idea.
>
> Yes, you could do this.
>
> The Netgraph TCP/IP is a good idea for research work, but a bad
> idea for general implementation purposes, since it's performance
> will be very poor, compared to a monolithic TCP/IP implementation.
>
Interesting, why is click so fast then? What does it have that netgraph doesn't. Just in case http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu then click on click(hehe).
Alex Newman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021108002525.GC86846>