Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:38:27 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing socket buffer timeout to a u_long? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211211637000.69388-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <3DDD79D0.888A1A39@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase > the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence > number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at > high data rates. That's what the timestamp option does and I think it was a good idea, given the range of systems TCP needs to work well on. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211211637000.69388-100000>