Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:31:17 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>, Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serious issues with kqueue on sockets on CURRENT. Message-ID: <20030110233117.1F3302A8A0@canning.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <3E1F20B4.8456F855@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > > I can definitely reproduce this here and also fairly angry about it. > > > In addition to what you mentioned, fstat() gives an incorrect st_size > > > result now and it's likely that non-NOTE_LOWAT low watermarks are > > > firing too early as well. > > > > > > Ugly test program @ http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/kq.c > > > > If I ensure the write only happens after the child is waiting on kq, the > > bug does not show up for me. > > > So that's the kqueue bug, right? That an event is not generated > for pending input at the time that the event is registered? Folks, *PLEASE WATCH THE CC: LIST*! re@ does not need to be cc'ed on the speculation. They've been made aware of the issue, and if a conclusion is reached then they need to know that too. But overflowing re@ with email is not a good way to get the release polished off. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030110233117.1F3302A8A0>