Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:16:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI geometry calculation? Message-ID: <20030514161256.N79399@root.org> In-Reply-To: <3EC2CBD0.3020102@btc.adaptec.com> References: <20030514151752.B79363@root.org> <3EC2CBD0.3020102@btc.adaptec.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > Most drivers use >1G: 255/63, else 64/32. Exceptions are: > > * aac - >=2G: 255/63, >=1G 128/32, else 64/32 > > * aha - same > > * bt - same as aha Why are aha and bt using an extra 2G step instead of the normal 1G step? They're not RAID controllers. Did you use that geometry for aac intentionally or was it just a cut/paste? > I'm really not sure what to say > about the boundary cases other than if they are buggy, few people > notice. Would it be ok to move them all to > and not use >=? -Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030514161256.N79399>