Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:52:10 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...) Message-ID: <20030802175210.GB584@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <3F2B7C0B.8C3DB94B@mindspring.com> References: <20030801230157.GA6323@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308011911520.321-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030801233758.GA7023@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <3F2B7C0B.8C3DB94B@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:53:31AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > But if we only use the dynamic allocation then it can only fail for > > a combination of 3rd party code. > > You meant to say static here, e.g. when there are two libraries > linked into a single aplication, and both libraries want to get > entry #6, right? Yes. My wording was incomplete. > In the dynamic case, this will Just Work(tm), because each one > will end up getting a different value. Correct. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030802175210.GB584>