Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:18:39 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: which flash? (plugins, wrappers) Message-ID: <200311200218.hAK2Icab093548@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <3FBC1F44.6060309@isi.edu> References: <200311191611.hAJGBcaa078764@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <3FBC1F44.6060309@isi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:56:20 -0800 Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU> wrote: > I am a bit confused about which flash plugins & wrappers to > use. I've been using these: > flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 > linux-flashplugin-5.0r51 > And the recent mails on new flash stuff got me interested, > and here's what I found under www/ > flashplugin > flashplugin-mozilla (flashplugin-mozilla-devel) flashplugin is a free implementation of Flash5(4?). +- flashplugin-mozilla +- flashplugin-mozilla-devel these are flashplugin's slave port for mozilla/mozilla-devel. > linux-flashplugin > linux-flashplugin6 These are Flash5/Flash6 implementation provide by Macromedia. By nature, we can use on linux mozilla/netscape7, but.. > flashpluginwrapper Yes, we can use linux-flashplugin on FreeBSD native mozilla by this port. > So what's the recommended combination here? Should I uninstall > what I have before going to the new flash (6.0) stuff? Maybe, flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 and linux-flashplugin-5.0r51. Or new linuxpluginwrapper-20031120(not committed) and linux-flashplugin6-6.0r79. > My current browser is mozilla 1.5, but will probably upgrade to > 1.6a soon. > Thanks, Please wait until commit linuxpluginwrapper, if you use Flash6. > yushun. > -- > Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@isi.edu> > USC Information Sciences Institute
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311200218.hAK2Icab093548>