Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:51:55 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc / doc-bugs split? Message-ID: <20031205105155.469c15b7.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3FD08FD3.D55993D1@easytree.net> References: <xzpbrqnl74x.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3FD08AD0.8080206@centtech.com> <3FD08FD3.D55993D1@easytree.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:01:55 -0500 Peter Serwe <peter@easytree.net> wrote: > That's a much loved idea from this side of the world >=20 > Eric Anderson wrote: >=20 > > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > > > >How would people feel about splitting -doc into -doc and -doc-bugs > > >like the ports people did with -ports? Since I'm mainly a src > > >committer and my time and resources are limited, I'd like to be able > > >to keep track of infrastructure discussions without having to wade > > >through bug reports. > > > > > > > > I was just thinking the same thing about 2 days ago.. I like it! >=20 I'd support your idea DES! --=20 Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031205105155.469c15b7.trhodes>