Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:41:31 +0100 From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> To: Payne <payne@magidesign.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Version... Message-ID: <20031205184131.73151431.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <3FD0AE4B.7020207@magidesign.com> References: <3FD0AE4B.7020207@magidesign.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Fri__5_Dec_2003_18_41_31_+0100_dwyUsaG8kk1fN8cC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I am wondering why there was 4.9 release if the newest one it 5.1. > Whick is better I am currently on 5.1. It's a little confusing. Well > there be a 4.10 and 5.2 release at the same time? 4.9 is the stable production release, while 5.1 (and in a few weeks, 5.2) is the development release that will eventually become the stable release. FreeBSD 4 will be developed (well, maintained, since few new features are added to it at this time, mostly driver updates from what I've seen) until the development team thinks FreeBSD 5 at least as fast and rock solid as FreeBSD 4. This is planned to happen when FreeBSD 5.3 released; at that point, active development for FreeBSD 4 will halt. FreeBSD 5.1 is a development release. While it runs OK for most people, some architectural things are going to change with 5.2 and 5.3, and you're advised not to rely on it with your critical stuff, but use 4.9 instead. Hope this clears things up. Greetings Benjamin --Signature=_Fri__5_Dec_2003_18_41_31_+0100_dwyUsaG8kk1fN8cC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/0MNOgShs4qbRdeQRAka0AJ0d9nFeBCsuPoRLCcX+pH2afKyGcgCggN0r 6bLFzNmps1ZaltmzvnAgX8s= =/Dms -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__5_Dec_2003_18_41_31_+0100_dwyUsaG8kk1fN8cC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031205184131.73151431.benlutz>