Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 20:55:01 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@haven.uniserve.com> To: Peter Berger <peterb@telerama.lm.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD for DEC Alpha Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950215204845.478D-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <3hugm4$cq@ivory.lm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Feb 1995, Peter Berger wrote: > That's an unworthy comment. NetBSD 1.0/i386 is rock solid, and arguably > more of a "clean" release than 2.0. I've run both; I'm running FreeBSD > now. Ok, I've been set straight on the stability of NetBSD (and personally reminded to stay away from e-mail after discussing our company's future or lack thereof with my boss). Ok, why do we have two i386 BSD's then? Seems like a bit of wasted effort? (I should also point out that, I've been partial to NetBSD myself since it's multi-platform support made it more BSD-like, but I sort of "fell" into FreeBSD) Tom (who knows he will be flamed about that last paragraph)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950215204845.478D-100000>