Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:20:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto <hlen@ig.com.br> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages? Message-ID: <20040123162026.GA86427@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4010B14F.9050600@ig.com.br>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote: > Hello all, > > Maybe this is not the best list to post this question, > but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source > for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the > policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has > been described as very unstable at the present time. What do you mean by "policy for 5.1 package-feeding"? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAEUnKWry0BWjoQKURAkTAAKDqOVkNx5SHBiRzS5QftFbsnYY0JwCfbExQ UKl/Q9vm0mGiH75R8KlADL4= =5TIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040123162026.GA86427>