Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:37:33 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -fno-strict-aliasing Message-ID: <20040222183733.GI91129@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <4027D933.2030206@acm.org> References: <c11ba4d1.a4d1c11b@etat.lu> <20040209022820.00faa408@pyro.convolution.ti> <20040209043217.GA1009@xor.obsecurity.org> <4027871E.8080800@mindspring.com> <4027D933.2030206@acm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:02:11AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Richard Coleman wrote: > > I think it would be more honest if the party line was "FreeBSD > >has bugs, so we can't use -O2 right now" rather than the standard reply > >of "-O2 is not supported, don't even try". > > I think the party line is very honest: > > "You are not the one millionth person to report this, > so you don't get a prize. However, you could be the > first person to fix it. ;-)" I would love to make -O2 work. But as long as "lib/libpam" is on the list of things to fix, that isn't going to happen. Someone needs to pressure DES to fix his babies [that he wont let others touch]. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222183733.GI91129>