Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 12:36:47 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades) Message-ID: <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <20040608144433.D31793@unsane.co.uk> <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com> <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees > >> many commits that are likely to be problematic. > >> > > In general, no. > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > QED I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... What's "QED"? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran>