Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:26:48 +0200 From: sebastian ssmoller <sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: acpi pci irq routing Message-ID: <20040810092648.64e582c2.sebastian.ssmoller@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <41182054.7090109@root.org> References: <41131EEC.4050909@root.org> <291946042.22742@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> <41182054.7090109@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, not sure what i should expect (to see). but this patch looks good here. everything works fine. no errors nor warnings. all irqs seem to be ok. thx regards, seb ps: hardware: asus m2400n notebook On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:09:40 -0700 Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: > Thanks for all the feedback to everyone who responded. I have > finished > reworking our PCI irq routing approach and the result is much simpler > while retaining the existing weighting algorithm from acpi_pci_link.c > (around since Oct. 2002). It removes the hack which causes the first > IRQ to be chosen from possible IRQs if the BIOS hasn't routed an > interrupt. The selection algorithm is to always use the BIOS irq, if > valid, and then select from the weighted priority list if that fails. > I've tested both approaches fully. > > Please test this patch to be sure all PCI devices continue (or begin) > to > function as expected. If something fails for you, please send me the > dmesg from boot -v. > > Thanks, > Nate > -- "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." --- Antoine de St. Exupery, Wind, Sand, and Stars, 1939
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040810092648.64e582c2.sebastian.ssmoller>