Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:42:35 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will+freebsd-amd64@will.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or AMD64? Message-ID: <20040929184235.GC2493@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <415A7A07.50801@will.iki.fi> References: <4159BFE3.5030009@mackanics.net> <20040928212410.GX2493@submonkey.net> <415A7A07.50801@will.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TSoBXhsGT8MFtrg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:01:59PM +0300, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: >=20 > >None of the JVMs or Scheme ports work on amd64, which is a shame. Other > >than that, everything I use is fine (KDE is definitely fine). > >=20 > > > Of the Scheme ports, guile works, and if you want a more extensive=20 > Scheme environment, PLT Scheme is fairly easy to fix. Attached is a=20 > patch (against version 208) that should get it to work if you're willing= =20 > to build manually. It fails to build some extensions, though, there's=20 > still an -fPIC missing somewhere, but you still end up with a perfectly= =20 > usable environment. This is really useful - thank you! Ceri --=20 It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. --TSoBXhsGT8MFtrg5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWwIbocfcwTS3JF8RAib+AJ4hAgzeaefNOP1cyoybj4EjrzqzQwCcDbdu k0dW1LYRADHmYGnPEHl05iA= =elIa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TSoBXhsGT8MFtrg5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040929184235.GC2493>