Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:01:48 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh protocol in 5.3 Message-ID: <20050101010148.GA82948@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <41D5EFE9.4010009@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> References: <41D724CF.6020404@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> <20041231224613.16692.qmail@rahul.net> <41D5EFE9.4010009@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 12:33:45AM +0000, Robin Becker wrote: > """Just FYI, 5.3 is not an "upgrade" from 4.9. Its about 25% slower. Do > a google groups search with "mailing.freebsd.questions 5.3 performance > tests". Robert Watson gives a pretty good explanation about the work > that needs to be done to get 5.3 up to production standards.""" It's slower for some things, faster for others. It's also better in a number of ways (hardware support, feature support, etc) than the 4.x branch. Try it yourself and see. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB1fZ7Wry0BWjoQKURAj3CAJsEAiFcownWtMO4fEH66FKwmhaj9QCfeEPM nn8FGapX5PRN0WRUQoBOmZA= =Ohmj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050101010148.GA82948>