Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:09:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Vince Hoffman <jhary@unsane.co.uk> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dhcpd for ipv6 Message-ID: <20050113230919.U11552@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <41E6A4F6.2020202@mac.com> References: <41E63E33.5010506@locolomo.org> <41E6A4F6.2020202@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Erik Norgaard wrote: >> kame dhcpd does not support address allocation and isc-dhcpd does not >> support ipv6 - despite ipv6 being defined in 1996. This makes running an >> ipv6 based local network cumbersome to manage. > > You're absolutely right. > >> Does anyone know of alternatives? I'm confused, I have a /64 from the hurricane electric tunnelbroker. I use rtadvd on the server that is the tunnel endpoint, advertise the /64 using rtadvd and use rtsold or XPs equivelent so any address's are the prefix then the mac address of the client machine (am using rtsold on netbsd and windows XP's ipv6 both of which work fine) so it seems pretty easy to manage a single subnet lan. to me Vince > > Certainly: use IPv4. ISC's dhcpd does just fine with classic IPv4 addresses. > > -- > -Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050113230919.U11552>