Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:50:32 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay Message-ID: <813611053.20050329205032@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <42498D19.60209@makeworld.com> References: <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEPAFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <1648629793.20050329122346@wanadoo.fr> <42496060.1060404@makeworld.com> <467487023.20050329162852@wanadoo.fr> <42496992.7020800@makeworld.com> <1805326777.20050329181237@wanadoo.fr> <42498D19.60209@makeworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris writes: > No - NOT the PC - the hardware that's in question. The Adaptec WITH the > modified code. I'm willing to bet, it's not. Should I check for restrictions on chipset temperature, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure as well? > Again - I doubt that that perticulare Adaptec WITH the modifide code is > listed. Now I'll bet an untouched Adaptec is. Nothing on the list says either way. > The PC is NOT the issue. The modified Adaptec IS. FreeBSD is the target, not the controller. > No - not worthless - NOT SUPPORTED. Just like the HCL that MS puts out. There are lots of configurations unsupported by Microsoft that will still run Windows without problems. > Another thing to understand, most of the HP added code is related to > SNMP. That's what HP/Compaq does. Now, you also need to realize that the > drivers under NT talk to HAL (Hardware Abstration Layer) which happenes > to be far more forgiving of altered code then something under Unix where > the driver talks directly to the hardware. Are you saying that Windows NT has a superior design? -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?813611053.20050329205032>