Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:27:01 -0700 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@offmyserver.com> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdesc allocation optimization Message-ID: <20050822142701.GD27233@raqdevil.offmyserver.com> In-Reply-To: <4309DF15.FD4D6C56@freebsd.org> References: <20050822100059.GA24626@FreeBSD.org> <863bp25c7t.fsf@xps.des.no> <4309D5D7.C7C76B5B@freebsd.org> <86d5o63wuw.fsf@xps.des.no> <4309DF15.FD4D6C56@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > > Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> writes: > > > When did you commit this? Is it only in post 5.0 releases? > > > > Early 2004, before RELENG_5 was branched. > > That explains why DFBSD didn't have it. So we are better off in > anything >5.x despite the uninformed comments on the DFBSD lists. > > -- > Andre I think that they actually did a good bit of research into all of the fdalloc implementations in the BSDs before choosing their path. Perhaps misunderstood is a more accurate word than uninformed. --Devon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050822142701.GD27233>