Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:13:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> To: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI support Message-ID: <20051122190836.D16821@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <438349C8.5020502@dial.pipex.com> References: <43824EF0.8090807@endries.org> <20051122002352.G75644@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051122062506.GD13838@yoafrica.com> <20051122121855.J89225@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051122160343.GB6893@dan.emsphone.com> <20051122171702.H9431@chylonia.3miasto.net> <438349C8.5020502@dial.pipex.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>> affect of transfer speed for ONE process reading one file, but not >> multiuser system. > > Regardless of whether iSCSI is any good, it's a common access method for SAN > devices, and from what I've been told, may be the *only* access method. So AFAIK it's SCSI over FC, SCSI over IP was next probably to eliminate expensive FC, that was "invented" first to make things more expensive. looks like politicians - first they get 1000$, then give 100$ back and say how much they gave ;) anyway - for already existing iSCSI devices driver won't hurt of course, but i'm sure nobody that understand things won't invest in such technologies.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051122190836.D16821>