Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:56:51 +0200
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Michael Vince <mv@roq.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Cody Holland <cholland@redmoonbroadband.com>
Subject:   Re: BSD vs Linux Threads
Message-ID:  <20051202115651.GA1811@flame.pc>
In-Reply-To: <438FB8DD.8000106@roq.com>
References:  <4B3EE484EEA4F344BBB62F8316489986554676@corpsrv.RedMoon.local> <438FB8DD.8000106@roq.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-12-02 14:00, Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> wrote:
> For 6 Linux threads from my benchmarking and from what I have seen
> some peoples posts gives poor performance compared to libthr or
> libpthread I am using more of libthr over libpthread in 6.0 and have
> been benchmarking best results.
>
> Try this in /etc/libmap.conf
> [mysqld]
> libpthread.so.2         libthr.so.2
> libpthread.so           libthr.so

Unfortunately, "I have best results with libthr" is completely
worthless, unless you also describe the exact process of the
benchmark and why this particular benchmark is considered very
important for your specific application vs. other types of
workload :/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051202115651.GA1811>