Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:15:12 -0800 From: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org> References: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org> <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org> <32729773-B07C-4AEE-92D0-62ACE0E3AFEB@freebsd.org> <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:06 PM, David Xu wrote: > > I am using patch file jemalloc_20051222c.diff. I don't use > MALLOC_OPTIONS and don't create link malloc.conf in /etc. > I have tested super-smack with following command: > > %super-smack ./select-key.smack 10 5000 > Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 > connect: max=4ms min=1ms avg= 2ms from 10 clients > Query_type num_queries max_time min_time > q_per_s > select_index 100000 0 0 15895.76 Can you please try again with MALLOC_OPTIONS=aj, and (similar to the tests I ran): MALLOC_OPTIONS=aj super-smack ./select-key.smack 4 10000 It will be helpful to know whether your hardware behaves differently for the same test. Also, I don't have any working hardware right now, so I can't try to reproduce your results. Thanks, Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5>