Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:56 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: New jemalloc patch (was Re: KDE 3.5.0 seems much chubbier than 3.4.2) Message-ID: <200603141056.58397.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <440D2D86.3000802@FreeBSD.org> References: <200601301652.16237.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200602201040.48083.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <440D2D86.3000802@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart19385936.HQRSKaIyQd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 07 March 2006 17:21, Jason Evans wrote: [ snip ] > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/patches/jemalloc_20060306a.diff > > See the man page in the patch for runtime configuration options. > > Here's the C file: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/patches/jemalloc_20060306a.c > > I'm primarily interested in feedback regarding the following: > > * Stability > * Speed > * Memory usage I have been running it for the last few days and have not seen any stabilit= y=20 or excess memory consumption issues. Thanks! :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart19385936.HQRSKaIyQd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEFg3S5ZPcIHs/zowRAmNhAJ4rd8QzEJIFU9BccV/0CJxYunAQqQCfS0uV 1WWKCADm56qKvOYwUTF8vSw= =fKUn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart19385936.HQRSKaIyQd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603141056.58397.doconnor>