Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:27:26 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        mark <mark@immermail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: netgraph with 10Gig interfaces
Message-ID:  <20060814152726.GE96644@cell.sick.ru>
In-Reply-To: <44E094B9.1090303@immermail.com>
References:  <44D11785.1080107@immermail.com> <20060811111541.GE96644@FreeBSD.org> <44DC9A51.3030303@immermail.com> <20060814105120.GT96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060814124528.GC1763@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <20060814124810.GB96644@cell.sick.ru> <20060814130452.GD1763@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <44E094B9.1090303@immermail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:20:25AM -0700, mark wrote:
m> It sounds like there's an assumption it's a driver problem.  Note
m> that the intel 10Gig driver (from Interl's website) also does not work
m> with netgraph (works fine otherwise though)
m> 
m> Is there something that drivers need to do to support netgraph?

All Ethernet interfaces should instantly be supported by ng_ether(4).
ATM, I have no idea why you have problems with Neterion and Intel
interfaces.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060814152726.GE96644>