Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:33:28 -0500 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of portmaster Message-ID: <079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <CAB88xy_RU5TTE=pcsjCWsxWyU-jP91qzD9S-R1v6GKGHJg2=nQ@mail.gmail.com> <945f6d92-6834-7e2c-18c4-0a17e2c04122@columbus.rr.com> <44shneot7h.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> writes: > >> On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: >>> I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can >>> help me to make portmaster an actively maintained and used tool. >> >> If you can have it build in a clean chroot or jail then you'll get my >> attention > > What kind of special support? > > I use it with a chroot that mounts /usr/ports (and src) read-only, and > aside from the initial base system install, it took about fifteen > minutes to set up. > Using chroot or jails to build each individual package
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?079d97d0-8dc7-8dcd-460e-86644f12b900>