Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:39:40 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: Wang Yi <wangyi6854@sohu.com>, Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs working for anyone? Message-ID: <20070220143940.GA1590@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <45D9A109.5010505@janh.de> <op.tnzqzcrls1njbc@xp> References: <20070218174549.GA2489@roadrunner.q.local> <45D9A109.5010505@janh.de> <20070218174549.GA2489@roadrunner.q.local> <op.tnzqzcrls1njbc@xp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wang Yi wrote: > I'm using ntfs-3g now. the version is same to yours. But only the difference is the disk I > used is a physical disk. I also had no luck using it on my existing NTFS partition, though I'd like to experiment on a clean partition first. Could you please run a test with mdconfig and mkfs.ntfs (you have to use the -F flag)? Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > On 6.2-RELEASE using fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4, fusefs-libs-2.6.2, and fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1, I > can mount my existing (Windows XP) NTFS partition with 'ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1 /mnt/ad0s1'. > > The following error messages about missing /proc/filesystems and modprobe can be ignored, > since defaults are assumed in case of missing information. (I read about it on a fusefs > mailing list concerning Darwin.) The critical part seems to be the seekscript. Could one of you guys provide me with a ktrace/kdump output, so I can investigate this further? You should run ktrace with the -i flag and probably send the output off-list. Thanks! Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070220143940.GA1590>