Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:27:45 +1100 From: "Sam Wun" <smw2010@gmail.com> To: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms@incunabulum.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CARP behaviour Message-ID: <ff64092b0703041527h3aef8c21v5a4f50e0a51151d6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45EB4794.6040404@incunabulum.net> References: <45E8BB39.9030602@incunabulum.net> <20070303213406.GA40430@comp.chem.msu.su> <45E9FA3C.5030404@freebsd.org> <20070304061012.GF40430@comp.chem.msu.su> <45EB4794.6040404@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/5/07, Bruce M Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> wrote: > > Yar Tikhiy wrote: > >> We shouldn't cache route pointers anywhere anymore. It has been > completely > >> removed from the PCBs and things like gif and others. > >> > > Sounds like a good way to go, too! :-) Thanks! > > > gre(4) does very funky things with the route it caches to the tunnel > endpoint. Someone(tm) should have a look at that. Does F5 BigIP have that issue? BMS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ff64092b0703041527h3aef8c21v5a4f50e0a51151d6>