Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jonny@jonny.eng.br
Subject:   Re: Problems with rpc.statd and PAE
Message-ID:  <200708071330.l77DUtnb090255@lurza.secnetix.de>
In-Reply-To: <46B2A4DC.4080000@jonny.eng.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote:
 > Don Lewis wrote:
 > > I've been seeing this same problem for a long time on an 7.0-CURRENT
 > > i386 machine with 1GB of RAM, and I'm not using PAE.  I haven't
 > > discovered any obvious cause for the problem.
 > 
 > It's a production file server, so I cannot make any test today, but this 
 > weekend I'll try to recompile statd to use less memory.
 > 
 > Is there a good reason to map 256M at once?

Is there a good reason _not_ to do it?

rpc.statd has always mapped 256M, for as long as FreeBSD
exists (maybe longer).  I've never had a proble with that.
Obviously it does that because it makes managing the state
data easier.  That's enough of a good reason, I think.

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"File names are infinite in length, where infinity is set to 255 characters."
        -- Peter Collinson, "The Unix File System"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708071330.l77DUtnb090255>