Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:35:58 -0800 From: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net, Justin Hibbits <jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set up Message-ID: <472F466E.8050405@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <472EEADF.1000008@gmail.com> References: <472D56A1.7070206@gmail.com> <200711041119.45971.jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> <472DD231.9030501@gmail.com> <472E67CC.9040201@delphij.net> <472E4FF0.3080801@gmail.com> <472EB211.7050001@delphij.net> <472EEADF.1000008@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2F71A1E467749271B07BFC48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Since I am not the only person with these issues, see "sata ihc9r" > thread in -current, just the only one to document them formally (so far= ) > [hopefully the other two will write a good summary of the acd issue the= y > are seeing] there is need for easy reference for anyone working on > patches (or new frameworks such as one of person informed me of > privately). Among other things the wiki is meant as a way of knowinig= > the status of each task (may not be issue based per se). I suspect som= e > of these issues may be quickly resolved and the others will require som= e > research thus they may spread out of a few weeks or months. Ok >> Let's see what the "issues" on the wiki: >> >> - Mis-numbered adXXX on SATA drives >> This is non-issue. It's well documented in ata(4) that you can change= >> the behavior by removing the anti-foot-shooting option ATA_STATIC_ID >> from your kernel configuration; >> =20 >=20 > The default behaviour should be fixed if it is so easy then. How come the number is so important for you? What do you think if you have to drop into single user mode and adjust fstab manually and the box is several thousands of miles away from you after a simple 'make kernel'? I think changing this behavior is a big POLA and not the right thing to do. >> - Wrong SATA type/speed reported >> More information is needed if you really want to have this problem >> resolved, like atacontrol output, etc. >=20 > See the SATA ihc9 and previous threads if you really need to know all > the messy details but the bottom line is I have been told by several of= > the ATA developers that since they do not have IHC9 machines P35/IHC9 > owners where on their own (and thus the need for informal group the wik= i > is aimed at) Please provide links on the wiki if you really want it to be useful. I think the only ich9 issue I am aware of so far is that a specific model of it is not recognized. This is fixed in HEAD and RELENG_7. >> - PATA/SATA co-existence >> Is the PATA chip supported by the driver? What's its PCI IDs? >=20 > You accuse me of not doing my research... a simple search of the variou= s > threads these issues have come up will tell you that: >=20 > 1. Yes it does show up (I can even boot from it) but it is complete gon= e > from dmesg (even verbose), pciutil, etc. Ditto. > 2. The answer to the type/speed type issue from the commuhity is the > same one I got here Is the problem still exist for latest RELENG_7 and RELENG_6? Who can provide some basic testing for a new snapshot? No, it does not help if that's just "it panics", "foo is not supported" if no detailed information is provided and we don't have our hands on the actual hardware. >> Also I would like to say that it is much more useful if you will have >> someone who donate the proper hardware to sos@, our Mr. ATA. He is ve= ry >> knowledgeable about the driver and ATA/SATA stuff, and a very responsi= ve >> person. >=20 > 1. I will have to look it up but I think he is the one of the people > that told me p35/ihc9 owners where on their own. Again, it does not make sense if we don't even know how to contact these users. > 2. Some of the issues are pressing and some are just annonyances the > only pressing one for me is the PATA/SATA one and that is likelly to be= Could you please provide some more detailed information (e.g. previous posted message-id or a link to mail archive)? > the last one fixed because I suspect it relies on fixing the type/speed= > and (yet to be documented) acd issue(s). Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig2F71A1E467749271B07BFC48 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHL0ZuOfuToMruuMARCohsAJ4v4UJDY+GR2o5xdjOzpFXbu32axwCfZEsp ACSn7+RuMvc1EhJx90cmSLo= =fphe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2F71A1E467749271B07BFC48--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?472F466E.8050405>