Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:43:53 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: rihad <rihad@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pipe queues Message-ID: <20071211074353.GI11310@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <475E1E4D.4090409@mail.ru> References: <475D6FD7.2000500@mail.ru> <DCFF3417-FC01-4F2C-ACA5-03CC0881DE59@mac.com> <20071210120353.B40679@xorpc.icir.org> <475DA624.4010104@seclark.us> <475E1E4D.4090409@mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote: >And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without=20 >prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point. No you don't. I'm using pipes without queues extensively to simulate WANs without bothering with any prioritisation. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHXj+5/opHv/APuIcRAv/PAJ9Z67NqUrm6V4jm5i8QttsaDo2ePwCfUWG4 fRMdscWEKZ0CDu4ZLmYsY18= =Zuw2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071211074353.GI11310>