Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:21:59 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.x can't read 5.x dump? Message-ID: <200412021522.02664.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <47772.1101988548@thrush.ravenbrook.com> References: <47772.1101988548@thrush.ravenbrook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart9050364.4o0ZWqOHmq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:55, Nick Barnes wrote: > There's no theoretical reason why the formats used by dump and restore > shouldn't be forward and backward compatible, allowing an older > restore (to an older filesystem type) to pick out the parts of the > dump which make sense to it while ignoring parts which it doesn't > understand. There may be security reasons, though. If you've locked down a filesystem= =20 through the extensive use of ACLs, then you wouldn't want to dump/restore=20 it to another system that doesn't support those ACLs and expect your=20 security framework to still be intact - at least not without *lots* of=20 warnings. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart9050364.4o0ZWqOHmq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBBr4d65sRg+Y0CpvERAgREAJ9g1ErAWqgPo8rWUlg1Cmb3RbrygQCfQ3bF XQwlzuw1kZ2xPDB/oS4w4bw= =dLiX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9050364.4o0ZWqOHmq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412021522.02664.kirk>