Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:25:46 +0200 From: Jordan Gordeev <jgordeev@dir.bg> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Google SoC 2009 Idea Message-ID: <49A457CA.20704@dir.bg> In-Reply-To: <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org> References: <e8e9f3930902240943o2e2f4b1bh34916b775692a26f@mail.gmail.com> <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com> <e8e9f3930902241107j2e53c9fai9942ab14167831f@mail.gmail.com> <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Leffler wrote: > Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm <ray.mihm@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler. >>>> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD. >>>> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore >>>> Architectures. >>>> >>> Talk to jeff@freebsd.org, the author of ULE. >>> >> >> What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this >> project? >> >>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures. >>>> >> >> Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding", >> mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs. >> >>> These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA. >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> >> >> Waiting for your response, >> >> > I note you sent this same note to the netbsd mailing lists. You might > want to do some more investigation before you propose a project. > > Sam > It was also sent to the DragonFly mailing lists. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49A457CA.20704>