Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:06:57 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inline definition problem in current Message-ID: <20090325100657.GA31530@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <49C9F7F6.2000908@entel.upc.edu> References: <49C80DBA.80407@entel.upc.edu> <20090325033451.GA17442@zim.MIT.EDU> <49C9F7F6.2000908@entel.upc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:23:02AM +0100, Gustau Perez wrote: > So instead of hacking gcc reverting the changes made to it in current, > I think it would be wise to change the affected ports There are ~200 and counting. I am working on updating the package build machine's classification scripts to isolate them. > I can send PR's requesting the change for audio/faad > net-im/telepathy-mission-control already fixed. > and x11-wm/compiz-fusion-plugins-main There's not one for that one yet. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090325100657.GA31530>