Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:24:02 +0200 From: Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@FreeBSD.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: VMWare if_em breakage (was: Re: svn commit: r194865 - in head/sys: dev/e1000 modules/igb) Message-ID: <24BDCB76-0304-443A-96A9-71C5E537FF37@exscape.org> In-Reply-To: <4A43893F.5070100@andric.com> References: <200906241741.n5OHfTaw022417@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906251507090.75138@fledge.watson.org> <4A43893F.5070100@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 25, 2009, at 04:27 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2009-06-25 16:08, Robert Watson wrote: >> Since this change (and the two followups), I'm no longer able to >> use if_em >> reliable in VMWare Fusion. > > Same here, for VMware Workstation. The interface just stops working > after a bit of traffic. Not sure it's needed, but here's another "me too", also using Fusion. At first I thought it had frozen, but locally, in the VM window, everything worked fine. (I always interact with VMs via SSH to get copy/paste, better fonts etc). Also worth mentioning is that vmware-vmx ate 100% real CPU the entire time, despite the VM CPU (top in FreeBSD) showed 100% *idle*. Regards, Thomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24BDCB76-0304-443A-96A9-71C5E537FF37>