Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:18:00 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch (and gjournaled previuos nodes) Message-ID: <4A5053A8.2060902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A4FEBBC.30203@omnilan.de> References: <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <4A4FEBBC.30203@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Late, but now I'd like to jump in. It's never late. I have just uploaded fresh patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20090704.patch > I have a gournaled FS whoch lists it's consumer as ad12p6 You mean gjournal has provider names hardcoded to it's meta data? It could be a problem. If it detects it's parts freely, then it should not notice the change. > Otherwise I only use labels (ufs) for quiet some time, so I thought > testing would be painless... > Can I safely remove glabel from the unmounted fs and relabel the new > device? I don't very understand whet you mean by "safe"? Safe for what? -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A5053A8.2060902>