Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:16:32 -0500 From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> Subject: Re: Apparent IPv6 bug Message-ID: <4B874B20.2020900@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <4B874814.2060908@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B843CC7.1000700@FreeBSD.org> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737E6@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4306ADCA06@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <4B86EF92.6030202@FreeBSD.org> <4B874654.5090900@ibctech.ca> <4B874814.2060908@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2010.02.25 23:03, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/25/10 19:56, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Do you want more v6 traffic thrown at the interface for testing? > > Thanks for the offer, but the load I have on it now is the same as what > I had when I got the crashes, so I think it will either work, or it will > not work. :) No sense changing the environment that broke it previously then, lest an artificial benchmark is created. > 19+ hours and counting .... Very, very nice work on the patch Qing, especially the exceptionally short time between issue and repair. Cheers, Stevehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B874B20.2020900>