Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:09:58 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: spellberg_robert <emailrob@emailrob.com> Cc: fbsd_chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [_fbsd_chat_] why the different eol lengths ? [ was: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 7.2 EoL coming soon ] Message-ID: <864ohc52bd.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4C0E7626.3090807@emailrob.com> (spellberg robert's message of "Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:56:06 %2B0100") References: <4C0A67E7.3080405@freebsd.org> <4C0E5712.2000606@emailrob.com> <86eigho2m2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4C0E7626.3090807@emailrob.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
spellberg_robert <emailrob@emailrob.com> writes: > do fbsd project_people consider the right_most digit[s] to be > a "minor_version number", > a "patch_level" or > something_else ? A minor version number. The complete nomenclature for a release is <major>.<minor>-RELEASE[-p<patch>], where the last part is omitted until a patch is actually applied. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864ohc52bd.fsf>