Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:25:37 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: runaway intr problems: powerd and/or hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest related Message-ID: <4C7792A1.9090909@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C7234A1.3050108@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C71E858.90009@FreeBSD.org> <4C721334.1050000@icyb.net.ua> <4C7219B2.4070303@FreeBSD.org> <4C722209.1020405@icyb.net.ua> <4C72297D.90104@FreeBSD.org> <4C722ADD.1030103@icyb.net.ua> <4C7234A1.3050108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 23/08/2010 11:43 Doug Barton said the following: > Ok, so it seems that you're suggesting to disable throttling, so I added the > following to /boot/loader.conf: > > hint.p4tcc.0.disabled="1" > hint.p4tcc.1.disabled="1" > hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled="1" > hint.acpi_throttle.1.disabled="1" > > Not sure the .1.'s are necessary, but I wanted to be thorough. With that I get: > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2333/31000 2000/26000 1667/22000 1333/17000 1000/13000 > dev.est.0.freq_settings: 2333/31000 2000/26000 1667/22000 1333/17000 1000/13000 > dev.est.1.freq_settings: 2333/31000 2000/26000 1667/22000 1333/17000 1000/13000 > > hopefully that's more in line with what it should be? I'd really like to be able > to at least use powerd since it does seem to help with heat when the system is > idle (and by extension, power consumption as well). > > Unless you say differently when I get up tomorrow I'll try this configuration > for a little while and see how it goes. So, how did this go? Did the change make any difference? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C7792A1.9090909>