Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:16:14 +0100 From: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni.trematerra@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kib@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic in uma_startup for many-core amd64 system Message-ID: <AANLkTin4BVCocB8Y=fdTK%2BPQReh8Z_=u008GB7gD=rOS@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD00DFB.7030603@freebsd.org> References: <4C9B9B9C.6000807@freebsd.org> <4CBBEBDF.3060905@freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=O4GtAKDqEr%2BR27E5Xe%2BdGBZc0d2_=KpobtuSW@mail.gmail.com> <4CBC5719.1020807@freebsd.org> <AANLkTim-z-rNvPa%2BFDGAb7oroKB2DWxZSECti=ioH8GD@mail.gmail.com> <4CBD40E2.7030507@freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=6aMwph7-mh4QUUUiiox2S%2BN86agZRgAVw6=QT@mail.gmail.com> <4CD00DFB.7030603@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 01/11/2010 19:09 Giovanni Trematerra said the following: >> Here the patch that was in my mind. >> The patch doesn't implement dynamic slab size just allow >> to have a multipage slab to back uma_zone objects. >> I'm going to work more on the topic "dynamic slab size" soon. >> I tested the patch on qemu with -smp 32. >> I'm looking for real hw to test the patch on. > > Having only skimmed the patch I have a question - is this only used for i= nternal > zones? =A0"Application" zones with large items still use off-page slabs? > Yes, it is used only for internal zones. Other zones will go off-page as us= ual. -- Giovanni Trematerra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin4BVCocB8Y=fdTK%2BPQReh8Z_=u008GB7gD=rOS>