Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:50:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Beat Gaetzi <beat@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/thunderbird Makefile distinfo ports/mail/thunderbird/files patch-mozilla-xpcom-reflect-xptinfo-src-xptiInterfaceInfoManager.cpp Message-ID: <20101214145042.GB19947@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D073CEA.7030808@FreeBSD.org> References: <201012101451.oBAEpxuL094179@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101213052536.GA84102@FreeBSD.org> <4D05E761.5020409@FreeBSD.org> <20101214025135.GA20090@FreeBSD.org> <4D073CEA.7030808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On 2010/12/14 03:51, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > >Separating Cs into C_B and C_I suggest that there are at least comparable > >number of ports that require each one, but I've only seen ports conflict > >because they install the same files. Can you give us a list of ports > > Just because you haven't seen something does not mean it doesn't exist. I never implied it does not exist. Hence the "can you give" part and consecutive idea that it might (should?) be fixed in proper way. Why did you quote me only partially? > >Same shit, but now 8 characters > >longer and does not line up nicely with most of the knobs in Makefile. > > So now the beautiness of Makefiles should take precedence over > functionality? You know, quite often beautiness of Makefiles indicate how beautiful underlying infrastructure is. You also apparently neglected my technical point: even if new stuff is OK, why not *improve* it by defaulting CONFLICTS to CONFLICTS_INSTALL? > Now can we get back to doing something useful, like replacing spaces in > Makefile headers with tabs? Any problem with that? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101214145042.GB19947>